H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Sakkari vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-1
Maria Sakkari and Saisai Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Sakkari leads 1–0 on grass, while Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 San Jose semifinal 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2025 | Adelaide | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 6-2 4-0 (ret.) | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2019* | San Jose | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2016 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-4 6-3 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maria Sakkari | 6-3 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 259 | 205 | 55.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Sakkari | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |