H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Maria Sharapova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Maria Sharapova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2006 US Open semifinal 6-0 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 8, 2006* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Maria Sharapova #4 6-0 4-6 6-0 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Jul 7, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-3 3-6 6-2 Maria Sharapova #4 Match data
Nov 13, 2005* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 7-6(1) 6-3 Maria Sharapova #3 Match data
Nov 10, 2004 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 7-5 6-4 Maria Sharapova #6 Match data
Nov 6, 2004* Philadelphia WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 (w/o) Maria Sharapova #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,238 596 174 77.4% 5 14 1 9 7 36
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Sharapova Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,779 0 2 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,063 1 7 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,068 1 10 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,210 2 15 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,113 2 16 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,098 3 19 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,050 3 20 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,981 3 22 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,993 3 24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2012 55–10 84.6% #2 2,155 4 27 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,136 4 29 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,093 5 33 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,044 5 35 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,049 5 35 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 1,976 5 36 — — — — — — —
31 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,929 5 36 — — — — — — —
32 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,858 5 36 — — — — — — —
33 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,820 5 36 — — — — — — —