H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marie Bouzkova vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 1-2
Magdalena Frech holds a 2–1 lead over Marie Bouzkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Frech leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2026 Mérida quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | Mérida | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Marie Bouzkova | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Marie Bouzkova | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2024* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marie Bouzkova | 6-0 3-6 6-4 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Bouzkova | #21 | #21 | 2,019 | 1,915 | 164 | 135 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marie Bouzkova | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #52 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #44 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #42 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #21 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |