H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Marina Erakovic vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 0-1

Maria Kirilenko holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2009 Monterrey Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Kirilenko #38 6-4 6-3 Marina Erakovic #70 Match data Mar 5, 2009* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marina Erakovic — #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maria Kirilenko — #10 3,471 1,919 287 231 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marina Erakovic Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1
19 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1
20 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0 2007 29–27 51.8% #25 1,740 0 2
21 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5
22 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,721 0 5
23 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,830 0 5
24 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5
25 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,670 0 1 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5
26 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6
27 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6
28 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marina Erakovic Maria Kirilenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2007 25 18 43 58.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 204 152 356 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's and 385/515 of Maria Kirilenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marina Erakovic Maria Kirilenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9%
19 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8% 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6%
20 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8% 2007 47/56 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3%
21 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2% 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5%
22 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6% 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5%
23 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5% 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4%
24 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6% 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3%
25 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4% 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6%
26 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9% 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5%
27 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0% 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6%
28 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4% — 385/518 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marina Erakovic Maria Kirilenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35
17 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -42 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06
19 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +4 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.14 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13
20 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -44 +13 +209 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05 2007 1740 141.5 +3.14 +1.28 1.100 52.1% +5 -193 -198 54.3% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 -1.01
21 2009 1515 109.0 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -39 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07 2008 1725 136.9 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +94 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.03
22 2010 1481 102.8 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -45 — +253 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06 2009 1721 129.6 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -219 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.09
23 2011 1628 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -75 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.25 2010 1830 151.9 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -270 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69
24 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -32 +125 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89 2011 1849 143.8 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% -1 -89 -261 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59
25 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -28 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +19 -110 -41 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37
26 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +40 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33 2013 1792 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +15 +5 -69 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73
27 2015 1543 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +76 -40 +68 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +13 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37
28 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.34 — 1919 145.4 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.