H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Marina Erakovic vs Na Li H2H: 0-1

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2010 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #17 6-2 6-0 Marina Erakovic #253 Match data Jan 20, 2010* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marina Erakovic Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 — — — — — — — 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marina Erakovic Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marina Erakovic Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marina Erakovic Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.