H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 3-1
Marketa Vondrousova holds a 3–1 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marketa Vondrousova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marketa Vondrousova won the 2022 Indian Wells third round 3-6 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 3-6 7-5 7-6(5) | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2021* | Moscow | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 6-4 | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marketa Vondrousova | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2017* | Biel | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-4 7-6(6) | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marketa Vondrousova | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |