H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-0
Marketa Vondrousova holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marketa Vondrousova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marketa Vondrousova won the 2021 Chicago 2 fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2021* | Chicago 2 | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-4 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marketa Vondrousova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |