H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Johanna Konta H2H: 2-1
Marketa Vondrousova holds a 2–1 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Marketa Vondrousova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marketa Vondrousova won the 2019 Roland Garros semifinal 7-5 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Marketa Vondrousova | 7-5 7-6(2) | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| May 18, 2019* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Johanna Konta | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marketa Vondrousova | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |