H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC

Marta Kostyuk vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 1-0

Marta Kostyuk holds a 1–0 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marta Kostyuk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marta Kostyuk won the 2021 Chicago 1 second round 6-2 6-3.

Ukraine Age 24 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marta Kostyuk #56 6-2 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #70 Match data Aug 26, 2021* R16 Chicago 1 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marta Kostyuk #10 #10 4,040 2,109 162 120 57.4% 0 1 0 0 2 3
Kaia Kanepi — #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marta Kostyuk Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2018 3–5 37.5% #119 1,515 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2019 2–3 40.0% #153 1,615 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2020 2–5 28.6% #99 1,661 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2021 19–16 54.3% #50 1,739 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2022 16–20 44.4% #69 1,754 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2023 23–20 53.5% #39 1,810 0 1 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2024 36–20 64.3% #18 1,889 0 1 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2025 25–19 56.8% #26 1,889 0 1 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 2026 36–12 75.0% #10 2,008 0 3 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,799 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,862 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,732 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,777 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,762 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marta Kostyuk Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2018 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 11 10 21 52.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 20 15 35 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2024 26 12 38 68.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2025 19 13 32 59.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2026 15 10 25 60.0% 16 1 17 94.1% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 107 80 187 57.2% 41 25 66 62.1% 14 15 29 48.3% — — — — — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/282 of Marta Kostyuk's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marta Kostyuk Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2018 8/8 4.8 6.9 54.1% 68.7% 45.4% 47.7% 63.8% 57.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 5/5 2.6 3.6 60.9% 63.8% 47.8% 48.7% 44.7% 57.2% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 7/7 3.6 5.3 62.0% 64.8% 43.4% 60.9% 35.8% 56.2% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 35/35 2.7 3.9 62.7% 61.9% 45.2% 51.6% 45.5% 55.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 35/36 3.4 5.3 60.8% 64.4% 41.0% 48.5% 40.3% 55.5% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 43/43 3.1 6.0 57.0% 66.3% 43.4% 48.0% 49.1% 56.5% 43.6% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2024 50/56 3.0 6.8 57.2% 65.8% 44.1% 52.9% 53.3% 56.6% 44.8% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2025 34/44 3.0 5.8 59.5% 67.7% 46.0% 62.0% 49.1% 58.9% 45.1% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 2026 47/48 3.8 4.1 58.1% 70.9% 47.6% 57.8% 53.0% 61.1% 46.8% 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 264/282 3.2 5.4 58.9% 66.3% 44.7% 53.3% 49.0% 57.4% 44.4% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marta Kostyuk Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1516 117.7 -0.89 -0.21 0.947 49.5% -2 +68 — 44.4% -0.33 0–2 — — +0.60 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 2019 1616 118.9 -1.57 +1.09 1.053 50.9% — +68 — 53.8% +0.23 0–3 (0%) — — -0.05 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2020 1662 127.8 -0.40 -0.50 0.959 49.2% -3 — — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 1740 135.9 -0.54 +0.60 0.990 49.9% -34 +8 -154 53.2% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 98.1 -0.69 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2022 1754 135.0 -0.66 +0.17 0.957 49.2% +1 -64 -136 46.5% -0.19 8–8 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -1.22 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2023 1811 147.7 +0.01 +1.37 1.002 50.2% +7 -145 -163 51.0% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 9–5 (64%) 103.7 -1.77 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2024 1890 152.6 +0.62 +2.38 1.033 50.9% +29 -120 -213 57.5% +0.47 16–5 (76%) 11–6 (65%) 113.1 -0.25 2007 1582 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +15 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +0.14
23 2025 1889 156.6 +2.04 +2.03 1.097 51.9% +46 -51 -328 56.3% +0.64 9–8 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 96.3 +1.53 2008 1762 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -3 -51 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.02
24 2026 2008 165.9 +4.20 +4.71 1.202 54.0% -66 +95 -229 70.1% +1.59 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 102.1 -2.46 2009 1604 134.3 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.80
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1843 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -59 -101 -166 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -0.99
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1839 132.4 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -38 +74 -165 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1720 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +37 +80 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1660 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +50 +99 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1664 112.6 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 125.5 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +34 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1777 140.4 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +33 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.22
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 2109 153.4 +0.90 +1.88 1.042 51.0% +2 -12 -197 55.5% +0.44 57–46 (55%) 37–35 (51%) 103.9 -1.61 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +23 +4 -154 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.