H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Marta Kostyuk vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 1-2
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Marta Kostyuk in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Marta Kostyuk leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2025 Indian Wells fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 24
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Marta Kostyuk | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2024* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Marta Kostyuk | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | Marta Kostyuk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Kostyuk | #11 | #11 | 3,926 | 2,110 | 150 | 113 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Kostyuk | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #119 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #50 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2023 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2025 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #26 | 1,892 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2026 | 27–6 | 81.8% | #11 | 2,090 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |