H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 0-2
Anett Kontaveit holds a 2–0 lead over Martina Trevisan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2021 Indian Wells second round 6-3 5-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 5-2 (ret.) | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2017* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anett Kontaveit | 6-1 6-3 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |