H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Olga Govortsova
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Martina Trevisan vs Olga Govortsova.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |