H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Mayar Sherif vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-1
Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Mayar Sherif in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 7-5 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EGY
Age 30
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 7-5 7-6(1) | Mayar Sherif | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayar Sherif | #73 | #31 | 1,385 | 1,836 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,864 | 80 | 94 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mayar Sherif | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #63 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #52 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #65 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1–13 | 7.1% | #109 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #73 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |