H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michelle Larcher De Brito vs Vesna Dolonc H2H: 1-0
Michelle Larcher De Brito holds a 1–0 lead over Vesna Dolonc in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Larcher De Brito leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2010 Charleston second round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 33
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Michelle Larcher De Brito | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Vesna Dolonc | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Larcher De Brito | #1,216 | #76 | 821 | 1,630 | 30 | 42 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vesna Dolonc | #603 | #84 | 788 | 1,579 | 23 | 40 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Larcher De Brito | Vesna Dolonc | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #296 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2008 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #130 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2009 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #113 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #210 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #117 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #226 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |