H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Mihaela Buzarnescu vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 1-0
Mihaela Buzarnescu holds a 1–0 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mihaela Buzarnescu won the 2019 Hiroshima fourth round 7-6(1) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2019* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mihaela Buzarnescu | 7-6(1) 7-5 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mihaela Buzarnescu | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |