H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mirra Andreeva vs Arina Rodionova H2H: 1-0
Mirra Andreeva holds a 1–0 lead over Arina Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirra Andreeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirra Andreeva won the 2024 Brisbane fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 19
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2024* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Mirra Andreeva | 6-1 6-1 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirra Andreeva | #5 | #5 | 5,751 | 2,131 | 125 | 51 | 71.0% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mirra Andreeva | Arina Rodionova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2023 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2024 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #16 | 1,942 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2025 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,934 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2026 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #5 | 2,059 | 1 | 6 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |