H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Misaki Doi vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-2
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2015 Stanford fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2011* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-1 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |