H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Misaki Doi vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 3-0

Misaki Doi holds a 3–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Misaki Doi leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Misaki Doi won the 2021 Charleston Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Misaki Doi
Japan Age 35 Left-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Misaki Doi #77 6-3 6-3 Yaroslava Shvedova #738 Match data Apr 7, 2021* R64 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Misaki Doi #64 6-4 0-0 (ret.) Yaroslava Shvedova #51 Match data May 27, 2017* QF Nurnberg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Misaki Doi #37 6-3 6-4 Yaroslava Shvedova #47 Match data Aug 8, 2016* R64 Rio de Janeiro Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Misaki Doi #258 #30 1,555 1,734 99 167 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,753 143 177 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Misaki Doi Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 2010 0–3 0.0% #132 1,475 0 0 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 2011 6–11 35.3% #120 1,492 0 0 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,469 0 1
21 2012 10–9 52.6% #93 1,552 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2013 9–15 37.5% #90 1,569 0 0 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,666 0 1
23 2014 5–10 33.3% #124 1,553 0 0 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,577 0 1
24 2015 13–14 48.1% #54 1,657 0 1 2012 17–13 56.7% #29 1,690 0 1
25 2016 20–27 42.6% #40 1,668 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,651 0 1
26 2017 9–17 34.6% #122 1,530 0 1 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,647 0 1
27 2018 1–3 25.0% #128 1,571 0 1 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,617 0 1
28 2019 8–14 36.4% #82 1,644 0 1 2016 17–17 50.0% #37 1,708 0 1
29 2020 1–8 11.1% #83 1,572 0 1 2017 4–10 28.6% #289 1,616 0 1
30 2021 11–21 34.4% #105 1,588 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2022 5–13 27.8% #173 1,457 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2023 1–2 33.3% #258 1,488 0 1 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,604 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–10 9.1% #434 1,497 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Misaki Doi Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2008 4 12 16 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2012 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2009 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2015 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 5 8 13 38.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2016 11 19 30 36.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2017 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
30 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 68 113 181 37.6% 17 36 53 32.1% 14 18 32 43.8% — 71 109 180 39.4% 47 46 93 50.5% 25 22 47 53.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/267 of Misaki Doi's and 277/318 of Yaroslava Shvedova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Misaki Doi Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 2.3 2.7 45.6% 64.2% 50.7% 16.7% 47.2% 57.7% 46.4%
19 2010 3/3 0.0 2.0 68.2% 56.7% 42.6% 55.7% 13.9% 52.3% 34.8% 2007 17/24 2.6 3.4 57.6% 63.5% 44.3% 48.3% 51.3% 54.0% 39.2%
20 2011 15/17 1.1 3.4 62.4% 60.0% 40.7% 49.6% 40.7% 52.3% 41.7% 2008 14/19 3.1 2.9 62.5% 60.4% 48.9% 50.9% 42.9% 56.2% 42.2%
21 2012 19/19 1.7 3.0 62.4% 62.6% 48.8% 48.0% 42.8% 57.5% 45.5% 2009 33/35 3.5 3.2 60.1% 67.7% 49.4% 54.7% 45.7% 60.4% 44.5%
22 2013 20/24 1.3 3.2 59.3% 61.4% 48.6% 41.7% 39.2% 56.2% 42.1% 2010 41/45 3.2 4.4 60.1% 62.0% 43.5% 48.1% 41.2% 54.6% 44.1%
23 2014 15/15 1.7 2.7 60.4% 62.4% 40.8% 53.7% 46.0% 53.5% 41.4% 2011 18/19 2.8 3.7 60.4% 60.6% 49.6% 53.0% 52.7% 55.7% 42.9%
24 2015 18/27 2.4 2.5 62.7% 61.7% 46.2% 51.4% 59.2% 56.2% 42.3% 2012 26/30 3.2 4.6 60.9% 67.0% 49.4% 56.5% 49.7% 59.9% 47.3%
25 2016 42/47 1.9 2.2 59.9% 61.9% 47.1% 57.8% 41.6% 56.1% 39.3% 2013 20/25 1.8 5.8 63.5% 60.8% 42.5% 36.3% 50.2% 53.9% 43.7%
26 2017 24/26 1.1 1.9 62.7% 59.0% 46.8% 46.7% 40.3% 54.1% 40.0% 2014 30/31 3.7 4.7 67.1% 63.6% 42.8% 54.7% 52.0% 56.6% 43.7%
27 2018 4/4 0.8 2.3 63.7% 59.6% 42.9% 57.1% 52.2% 53.6% 42.4% 2015 22/27 3.9 4.1 70.8% 63.1% 53.3% 52.9% 46.3% 60.4% 37.2%
28 2019 22/22 0.9 3.1 59.9% 60.8% 46.1% 50.0% 54.7% 54.8% 40.3% 2016 29/34 3.4 4.0 60.8% 66.9% 44.5% 58.1% 49.7% 57.9% 42.5%
29 2020 9/9 0.7 4.1 63.4% 58.5% 41.4% 54.0% 41.3% 51.8% 39.5% 2017 14/14 2.3 2.6 63.8% 60.8% 53.3% 43.1% 46.9% 58.1% 37.1%
30 2021 29/33 0.9 2.7 61.8% 58.0% 45.0% 44.7% 51.9% 53.2% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 18/18 1.2 3.6 60.4% 60.0% 39.4% 56.5% 46.6% 52.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 3/3 2.0 1.7 68.4% 64.7% 49.6% 56.6% 34.7% 60.3% 35.7% 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 69.4% 50.0% 40.0% 37.5% 16.7% 46.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/11 2.4 4.4 61.6% 56.6% 34.9% 42.8% 59.3% 48.3% 41.9%
Career — 241/267 1.4 2.8 61.4% 60.6% 45.2% 50.8% 45.4% 54.6% 40.5% — 277/320 3.1 4.0 62.2% 63.5% 46.5% 50.6% 47.9% 56.9% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Misaki Doi Yaroslava Shvedova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1514 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1509 104.8 -1.22 -0.02 1.098 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.02
19 2010 1475 100.7 -0.02 -0.90 0.729 43.5% — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.27 2007 1492 109.2 -1.46 -3.15 0.852 46.6% +41 +11 +77 41.1% -0.72 5–5 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 96.9 +1.01
20 2011 1492 110.6 -2.09 -1.38 0.872 46.9% +9 — +124 35.3% -0.85 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.29 2008 1469 115.8 -0.04 -1.88 0.963 48.9% -8 — +123 40.0% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.13
21 2012 1552 111.2 +0.40 -0.63 1.068 51.3% -14 — +104 48.9% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 +1.74 2009 1601 137.0 +3.96 +0.37 1.124 52.2% -57 +30 -5 53.8% +0.55 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 +1.16
22 2013 1570 117.8 -0.57 -1.00 0.962 48.8% +1 -75 — 41.8% -0.62 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.40 2010 1667 129.4 -0.25 +0.48 0.973 49.2% -64 +71 -71 48.5% -0.03 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 104.8 +0.53
23 2014 1553 112.0 -1.33 -1.10 0.890 47.5% -8 — — 35.3% -1.15 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -0.48 2011 1578 115.3 -0.34 -1.96 0.967 49.3% +3 +72 -4 36.8% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 -0.35
24 2015 1658 123.9 -1.42 +0.28 0.967 49.9% -22 -122 -54 48.4% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -0.92 2012 1690 136.2 +3.39 +2.47 1.179 53.1% -98 +77 -21 59.7% +0.82 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 99.0 -0.23
25 2016 1669 124.6 +0.05 -2.56 0.894 47.9% -39 -94 0 42.7% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 -0.95 2013 1652 121.8 -0.93 -0.32 0.946 48.5% -128 +125 — 47.2% -0.15 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.25
26 2017 1531 112.4 -1.70 -2.51 0.872 47.2% -31 +75 — 32.1% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +0.29 2014 1648 124.3 +0.44 +0.21 1.008 50.2% -84 +42 +123 50.0% -0.03 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 -0.21
27 2018 1571 111.0 -0.62 -0.93 0.914 48.6% +3 — — 36.4% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 2015 1618 122.7 +0.99 -2.74 0.940 49.0% -34 +57 +131 51.6% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 -0.26
28 2019 1645 124.7 -1.10 -1.27 0.892 47.9% -30 — — 40.4% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +0.04 2016 1708 136.4 +1.33 -0.04 1.010 50.4% +6 -100 +67 51.4% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 -0.15
29 2020 1573 110.0 -2.38 -1.23 0.819 45.8% -9 +73 — 29.2% -1.38 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.58 2017 1616 115.6 +1.03 -2.59 0.886 47.4% +14 -16 — 37.5% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 -0.21
30 2021 1589 123.1 -2.40 -2.77 0.841 46.3% -9 -27 +70 35.3% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1458 108.2 -3.32 -3.02 0.784 45.3% +75 -2 — 29.3% -1.46 3–2 (60%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1489 114.0 -0.38 -0.81 0.899 47.3% +67 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.08 2020 1605 100.0 -0.65 -0.84 0.671 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 103.5 -3.87 -0.08 0.810 45.2% -11 +77 — 13.6% -2.86 1–1 2–0 — +0.48
Career — 1734 122.8 -1.24 -1.72 0.894 47.7% -11 -23 +50 38.9% -0.77 36–48 (43%) 23–28 (45%) 98.3 +0.11 — 1754 131.8 +0.75 -0.43 0.991 49.7% -38 +48 +42 47.4% -0.12 43–60 (42%) 39–42 (48%) 96.3 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.