H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Monica Niculescu vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 2-2

Monica Niculescu and Yaroslava Shvedova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Niculescu leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Niculescu won the 2014 US Open first round 6-7(5) 6-1 7-5.

ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Monica Niculescu #68 6-7(5) 6-1 7-5 Yaroslava Shvedova #51 Match data
Sep 26, 2009* Tashkent WTA 250 QF Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #55 6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 Monica Niculescu #80 Match data
Jun 24, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Yaroslava Shvedova #74 6-1 6-0 Monica Niculescu #62 Match data
Oct 3, 2008* Tashkent WTA 250 R16 Hard Monica Niculescu #70 6-3 3-4 (ret.) Yaroslava Shvedova #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,751 141 175 44.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Niculescu Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,470 0 1
21 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,665 0 1
23 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,576 0 1
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0 2012 16–12 57.1% #29 1,688 0 1
25 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,632 0 1
26 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,640 0 1
27 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,615 0 1
28 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3 2016 16–16 50.0% #37 1,700 0 1
29 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,598 0 1
30 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% 1,587 0 1
33 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3 2021 1–9 10.0% #434 1,493 0 1