H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 3-0

Na Li holds a 3–0 lead over Galina Voskoboeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Na Li won the 2012 Indian Wells Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Galina Voskoboeva
Kazakhstan Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #8 3-6 6-3 6-3 Galina Voskoboeva #53 Match data Mar 10, 2012* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #18 7-6(5) 6-0 Galina Voskoboeva #89 Match data Jun 24, 2009* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Na Li #20 6-3 6-4 Galina Voskoboeva #87 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Guangzhou Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Galina Voskoboeva #1,417 #42 1,284 1,701 70 121 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Galina Voskoboeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2004 3–4 42.9% #140 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 4–9 30.8% #113 1,465 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 2–11 15.4% #114 1,417 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2007 2–6 25.0% #133 1,406 0 0
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2008 8–12 40.0% #94 1,483 0 0
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2009 8–17 32.0% #106 1,483 0 0
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2010 0–4 0.0% #532 1,445 0 0
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2011 14–9 60.9% #58 1,663 0 0
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2012 13–20 39.4% #82 1,583 0 0
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 2013 13–16 44.8% #67 1,609 0 0
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 2014 2–6 25.0% #259 1,553 0 0
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 2016 0–3 0.0% #312 1,520 0 0
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 2017 1–4 20.0% #421 1,482 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Galina Voskoboeva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 5 9 14 35.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2013 9 12 21 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 52 87 139 37.4% 16 27 43 37.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 146/171 of Galina Voskoboeva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Galina Voskoboeva
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/13 2.0 2.3 56.8% 63.1% 47.2% 52.5% 45.5% 56.1% 32.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/8 1.8 2.8 54.5% 66.0% 46.7% 48.4% 42.0% 56.7% 42.7%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2008 14/20 2.7 3.4 56.3% 63.7% 40.8% 50.2% 37.1% 53.7% 40.6%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2009 22/25 2.4 2.3 58.2% 58.0% 37.9% 46.1% 50.9% 49.4% 40.3%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2010 4/4 3.0 3.0 54.5% 60.6% 39.7% 45.9% 37.3% 50.8% 37.4%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2011 22/23 2.9 3.1 52.1% 68.3% 49.6% 46.5% 52.9% 59.0% 45.8%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2012 30/33 3.7 2.3 56.4% 66.8% 49.7% 50.6% 42.7% 59.3% 42.1%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% 2013 28/29 3.5 3.0 58.1% 64.1% 45.4% 54.7% 41.8% 56.3% 42.8%
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% 2014 8/8 3.3 4.5 51.3% 58.8% 41.3% 40.0% 45.0% 50.1% 39.4%
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% 2016 3/3 2.3 1.0 60.3% 57.4% 41.4% 48.8% 32.0% 50.9% 42.0%
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% 2017 5/5 2.0 2.8 57.0% 59.2% 39.7% 52.7% 29.9% 50.9% 42.4%
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 146/191 3.0 2.8 56.0% 63.7% 44.8% 49.3% 44.1% 55.2% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Galina Voskoboeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2004 1503 103.3 — — — — +25 — — 37.5% -0.56 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.30
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1465 103.4 — — — — +26 — — 35.7% -0.93 0–2 0–2 — +0.62
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1418 113.9 +0.30 -3.05 0.747 44.5% +30 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–5 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 91.0 +0.15
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2007 1406 101.7 -1.48 -1.41 0.986 49.1% +23 +60 — 36.8% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.53
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2008 1484 119.6 -1.24 -2.21 0.877 47.3% +31 -13 — 39.5% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.25
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2009 1483 110.1 -3.61 -2.64 0.796 44.9% +33 -17 — 35.2% -1.20 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.8 -0.15
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2010 1446 102.1 -2.26 -2.45 0.760 44.1% +36 — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.05
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2011 1663 142.4 +3.10 +1.28 1.115 52.3% +1 — — 58.5% +0.66 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 100.0 -0.77
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2012 1584 127.7 +2.08 -0.93 1.034 50.6% +16 -58 -40 45.9% +0.08 2–10 (17%) 1–4 (20%) 89.2 -0.14
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 2013 1610 127.4 +0.38 -0.92 0.978 49.5% -11 -23 — 47.9% -0.11 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.9 -0.59
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 2014 1554 103.3 -2.15 -2.13 0.789 44.9% -17 — — 33.3% -1.22 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.50
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 2016 1521 99.3 -0.14 -0.92 0.857 46.4% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 2017 1482 104.1 -0.51 -0.05 0.862 46.4% -4 — — 33.3% -1.58 0–2 — — -0.53
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1450 92.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1702 124.2 +0.05 -1.13 0.935 48.5% +13 -21 -40 40.8% -0.54 21–45 (32%) 13–28 (32%) 86.5 -0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.