H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Na Li vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 6-0

Na Li holds a 6–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2012 Rome third round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Na Li #9 6-1 7-5 Iveta Benesova #51 Match data
Mar 22, 2012* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #8 7-5 6-2 Iveta Benesova #47 Match data
May 5, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Na Li #6 6-1 6-4 Iveta Benesova #65 Match data
Mar 7, 2009* Monterrey WTA 500 SF Hard Na Li #53 6-3 6-3 Iveta Benesova #31 Match data
Oct 25, 2008* Luxembourg WTA 500 QF Hard Na Li #27 6-4 4-6 6-2 Iveta Benesova #42 Match data
Mar 8, 2006* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #70 6-0 6-1 Iveta Benesova #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
30 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9 — — — — — — —