H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Na Li vs Katerina Bohmova H2H: 1-0

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Bohmova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2006 Estoril round of 16 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li

CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main draw meetings

Katerina Bohmova

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

Winner	Score	Loser	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Na Li #70	6-1 6-0	Katerina Bohmova #302	Match data	May 5, 2006*	R16	Estoril	WTA 250	Clay

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Na Li	#9	#2	7,585	2,117	338	159	68.0%	2	1	0	2	4	9
Katerina Bohmova	#302	#302	73	1,593	41	94	30.4%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Na Li							Katerina Bohmova
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
-9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1978	1–1	50.0%	—	1,515	0	0
-8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1979	0–1	0.0%	—	1,500	0	0
-7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	6–6	50.0%	—	1,553	0	0
-6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	4–11	26.7%	—	1,541	0	0
-5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	5–8	38.5%	—	1,569	0	0
-4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	5–18	21.7%	—	1,529	0	0
-3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	6–12	33.3%	—	1,551	0	0
-2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	9–14	39.1%	—	1,572	0	0
-1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	1–5	16.7%	—	1,535	0	0
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	1–3	25.0%	—	1,525	0	0
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	0–1	0.0%	#302	1,507	0	0
18	2000	1–3	25.0%	#136	1,496	0	0	2005	0–4	0.0%	—	1,466	0	0
19	2001	0–1	0.0%	#302	1,480	0	0	2006	3–9	25.0%	—	1,440	0	0
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2007	0–1	0.0%	—	1,430	0	0
22	2004	6–1	85.7%	#78	1,599	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2005	23–14	62.2%	#56	1,710	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2006	36–22	62.1%	#21	1,818	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2007	22–12	64.7%	#29	1,819	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2008	28–14	66.7%	#23	1,863	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2009	35–17	67.3%	#15	1,938	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2010	36–20	64.3%	#11	1,849	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2011	33–17	66.0%	#5	1,862	1	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	43–17	71.7%	#7	1,999	1	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	46–14	76.7%	#3	2,067	1	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	29–7	80.6%	#9	2,028	2	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Na Li																	Katerina Bohmova
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
-9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1978	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
-8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1979	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
-7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	—	—	—	—	6	5	11	54.5%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
-6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	0	2	2	0.0%	2	5	7	28.6%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	2	3	33.3%
-5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	—	—	—	—	4	6	10	40.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%
-4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	0	6	6	0.0%	4	7	11	36.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
-3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	4	6	10	40.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
-2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	1	4	5	20.0%	4	5	9	44.4%	4	5	9	44.4%	—	—	—	—
-1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	1	1	2	50.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2005	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
19	2001	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2006	0	4	4	0.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2007	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2004	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2005	16	12	28	57.1%	7	2	9	77.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2006	18	14	32	56.3%	12	4	16	75.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2007	13	5	18	72.2%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2008	26	12	38	68.4%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2009	22	9	31	71.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	7	3	10	70.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2010	17	14	31	54.8%	10	4	14	71.4%	9	2	11	81.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2011	16	12	28	57.1%	15	3	18	83.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	30	10	40	75.0%	12	4	16	75.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	35	8	43	81.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	6	2	8	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	22	3	25	88.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	222	104	326	68.1%	77	33	110	70.0%	37	18	55	67.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	—	6	25	31	19.4%	27	47	74	36.5%	5	13	18	27.8%	3	9	12	25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Na Li															Katerina Bohmova
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Schedule
-9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1978	1515	114.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	+1.25	—	0–1	-0.10
-8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1979	1501	94.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.00	—	—	+0.23
-7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	1554	115.1	—	—	—	—	—	+38	—	56.0%	+0.40	1–2 (33%)	1–1	+0.37
-6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	1541	120.5	—	—	—	—	+28	+49	+48	26.5%	-1.62	3–1 (75%)	1–2 (33%)	-0.03
-5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	1569	119.2	—	—	—	—	-25	+5	—	45.2%	-0.48	1–4 (20%)	1–1	+0.33
-4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	1530	113.2	—	—	—	—	-37	+76	—	31.4%	-1.43	1–6 (14%)	2–0	-0.29
-3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	1551	106.1	—	—	—	—	-36	+27	—	37.5%	-1.43	3–3 (50%)	2–1 (67%)	+0.12
-2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	1572	113.5	—	—	—	—	-68	-7	+5	44.8%	-0.67	4–8 (33%)	4–3 (57%)	+1.68
-1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	1536	102.9	—	—	—	—	—	-6	—	26.7%	-1.87	1–2 (33%)	0–1	-0.08
0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	1525	103.3	—	—	—	—	—	+4	—	22.2%	-2.00	1–0	0–1	-0.07
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	1508	99.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-0.67	0–1	—	+0.10
18	2000	1497	107.1	—	—	—	—	+34	—	—	14.3%	-2.14	0–1	—	-0.28	2005	1467	101.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	27.3%	-1.36	0–3 (0%)	1–2 (33%)	0.00
19	2001	1481	95.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	+0.11	2006	1440	102.5	—	—	—	—	-62	+74	—	33.3%	-0.87	2–4 (33%)	1–3 (25%)	-0.05
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2007	1431	98.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-0.67	0–1	0–1	+0.01
22	2004	1600	125.7	—	—	—	—	+18	—	—	81.3%	+1.81	1–1	2–1 (67%)	+0.19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2005	1711	139.1	-0.18	+0.14	0.999	49.8%	-25	-56	—	61.4%	+1.04	8–5 (62%)	4–4 (50%)	-0.34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2006	1819	148.6	+1.65	+1.60	1.068	51.4%	-79	-12	-62	61.2%	+1.05	9–4 (69%)	7–4 (64%)	-3.05	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2007	1820	150.2	+2.75	+2.06	1.133	52.7%	+69	-38	-48	62.2%	+0.96	7–7 (50%)	3–1 (75%)	+0.51	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2008	1864	153.6	+2.74	+2.93	1.119	52.6%	+37	—	-127	60.4%	+0.83	12–5 (71%)	4–4 (50%)	-1.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2009	1938	153.8	+4.35	+2.54	1.150	52.7%	+49	-152	-127	64.9%	+1.04	10–6 (63%)	8–6 (57%)	-1.61	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2010	1850	150.5	+4.51	+3.61	1.195	53.7%	-23	-4	+91	64.3%	+1.23	9–9 (50%)	6–7 (46%)	+0.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2011	1862	151.3	+3.52	+2.62	1.106	52.2%	-56	+132	+42	62.8%	+0.61	8–7 (53%)	9–6 (60%)	-0.74	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	2000	162.2	+5.42	+5.11	1.234	54.2%	0	-5	-158	68.1%	+1.30	11–10 (52%)	6–4 (60%)	-0.96	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	2067	165.5	+5.56	+6.05	1.265	55.0%	+56	-126	-177	72.1%	+1.64	8–5 (62%)	7–6 (54%)	-2.91	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	2028	156.0	+4.17	+5.37	1.275	55.5%	+113	-117	-158	75.0%	+1.82	6–4 (60%)	5–5 (50%)	+0.91	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2117	160.4	+4.01	+3.66	1.175	53.4%	+13	-21	-67	65.1%	+1.13	89–64 (58%)	61–48 (56%)	-1.86	—	1594	116.8	—	—	—	—	-34	+34	+16	37.0%	-1.03	17–35 (33%)	13–17 (43%)	+1.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Na Li's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Maria Sharapova	5	10	15	May 10, 2014	H2H
Serena Williams	2	11	13	Mar 23, 2014	H2H
Agnieszka Radwanska	7	5	12	Aug 17, 2013	H2H
Victoria Azarenka	5	6	11	Oct 21, 2013	H2H
Jelena Jankovic	6	4	10	Oct 21, 2013	H2H

Katerina Bohmova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Virginia Ruzici	0	3	3	May 27, 1987	H2H
Anne Hobbs	1	2	3	May 4, 1983	H2H
Emmanuelle Gagliardi	0	2	2	Sep 21, 2006	H2H
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere	0	2	2	May 28, 1986	H2H
Kim Jones	2	0	2	Feb 11, 1986	H2H