H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Laura Robson H2H: 1-1

Na Li and Laura Robson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 US Open round of 32 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Robson
Great Britain Age 32 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #6 6-2 7-5 Laura Robson #32 Match data Sep 1, 2013* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Laura Robson #89 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 Na Li #8 Match data Sep 2, 2012* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Laura Robson #764 #27 1,685 1,710 39 63 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Laura Robson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #517 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #403 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 1–5 16.7% #217 1,474 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2011 3–5 37.5% #133 1,508 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2012 16–15 51.6% #53 1,657 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2013 18–22 45.0% #44 1,661 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 0–2 0.0% #916 1,630 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2015 0–2 0.0% #557 1,594 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2016 1–8 11.1% #222 1,512 0 0
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2017 0–2 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Laura Robson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 13 23 43.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 22 33 55 40.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 18 27 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 95/101 of Laura Robson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Laura Robson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 10.0 14.0 59.6% 66.1% 42.1% 61.5% 50.0% 56.4% 37.8%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 4.7 4.0 63.7% 69.3% 38.8% 68.2% 31.9% 58.6% 30.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 8/8 2.4 5.8 54.8% 65.8% 40.9% 41.9% 43.5% 54.4% 42.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/31 4.2 5.8 57.1% 68.1% 44.4% 51.4% 44.3% 57.9% 43.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 37/40 4.5 5.8 55.6% 69.7% 43.4% 54.0% 44.4% 58.0% 42.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 4.0 3.5 59.1% 55.8% 36.7% 41.7% 50.0% 47.7% 34.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 5.0 11.0 57.6% 68.6% 35.7% 66.4% 34.1% 54.9% 38.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 9/9 2.8 5.3 56.5% 58.2% 41.5% 51.8% 36.2% 51.0% 38.0%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2017 2/2 2.5 4.5 58.7% 66.8% 43.5% 21.4% 3.6% 57.1% 34.4%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 95/102 4.1 5.8 56.8% 67.4% 42.7% 52.3% 41.8% 56.8% 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Laura Robson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1490 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.05
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1484 103.3 -0.52 +0.53 0.867 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1474 102.2 +0.56 -5.19 0.742 45.8% — — +98 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.50
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1508 110.8 +0.58 -0.57 0.932 48.6% +1 — +42 26.7% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.08
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2012 1658 135.1 +1.17 +0.07 1.034 51.0% -32 -64 -60 52.2% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.14
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2013 1662 129.1 +1.89 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -53 -51 -31 46.2% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 96.6 -0.17
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1630 100.1 -4.77 -2.42 0.663 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1595 101.1 -0.86 -1.36 0.846 46.6% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.19
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2016 1512 105.4 -2.56 -1.79 0.776 45.0% +6 +50 — 15.8% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2017 1465 96.8 -2.08 -0.78 0.802 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.18
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1710 126.6 +0.75 -0.88 0.952 49.1% -36 -35 -6 39.8% -0.43 11–16 (41%) 9–18 (33%) 96.1 -0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.