H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Na Li vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-6

Nadia Petrova holds a 6–1 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2012 Beijing third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #8 6-1 6-2 Nadia Petrova #14 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Stuttgart WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #18 6-2 6-3 Na Li #30 Match data
Jun 20, 2008* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Nadia Petrova #22 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 Na Li #48 Match data
May 13, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 SF Clay Nadia Petrova #4 6-1 6-0 Na Li #61 Match data
Mar 4, 2006* Doha WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #8 6-4 6-4 Na Li #71 Match data
Aug 15, 2005 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #10 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Na Li #45 Match data
Jan 7, 2005* Gold Coast WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 7-5 6-3 Na Li #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13