H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Na Li vs Sandra Kloesel H2H: 1-0
Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Kloesel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 7-6(4) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Na Li | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Sandra Kloesel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Sandra Kloesel | #1,064 | #87 | 400 | 1,515 | 16 | 54 | 22.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Na Li | Sandra Kloesel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #96 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #164 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |