H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 3-0

Na Li holds a 3–0 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 US Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Sofia Arvidsson
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #6 6-2 6-2 Sofia Arvidsson #100 Match data Aug 29, 2013* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #11 6-1 7-5 Sofia Arvidsson #51 Match data Jan 19, 2011* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #33 7-5 6-4 Sofia Arvidsson #66 Match data Feb 16, 2008* QF Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Sofia Arvidsson #320 #29 1,380 1,769 114 156 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Sofia Arvidsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #437 1,489 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #144 1,475 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #104 1,482 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 1–6 14.3% #213 1,433 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2005 13–8 61.9% #67 1,598 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2006 16–19 45.7% #62 1,536 0 1
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2007 6–11 35.3% #98 1,507 0 1
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2008 13–19 40.6% #56 1,536 0 1
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2009 0–8 0.0% #139 1,456 0 1
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2010 14–16 46.7% #53 1,549 0 1
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2011 16–23 41.0% #78 1,627 0 1
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 2012 27–21 56.2% #41 1,748 0 2
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 2013 6–18 25.0% #120 1,595 0 2
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 2014 0–1 0.0% #263 1,579 0 2
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 2015 0–1 0.0% #320 1,566 0 2
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Sofia Arvidsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 6 17 64.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 8 15 23 34.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2012 17 12 29 58.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 9 14 35.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 82 95 177 46.3% 25 42 67 37.3% 5 15 20 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 206/263 of Sofia Arvidsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Sofia Arvidsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/7 1.0 2.0 71.6% 50.0% 36.8% 53.8% 23.1% 46.3% 44.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/21 0.7 2.3 62.2% 69.3% 36.4% 56.7% 47.2% 57.1% 49.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 22/35 3.0 2.4 66.2% 63.7% 45.2% 47.2% 46.4% 57.1% 45.4%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2007 14/17 2.1 1.6 65.3% 55.1% 41.3% 47.3% 55.4% 50.1% 44.2%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2008 24/32 1.4 2.3 68.1% 59.6% 39.8% 47.1% 44.1% 53.2% 45.7%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2009 8/8 0.5 1.3 64.9% 48.9% 40.6% 43.7% 28.9% 45.8% 35.6%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2010 27/30 2.0 2.0 67.2% 61.0% 41.4% 50.7% 43.6% 54.5% 44.8%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2011 38/39 1.6 1.5 66.9% 55.7% 45.7% 45.8% 46.3% 52.1% 41.2%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% 2012 44/48 1.6 2.1 68.2% 58.5% 45.3% 51.9% 48.4% 54.3% 46.9%
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% 2013 23/24 2.3 1.5 67.1% 56.6% 46.5% 42.6% 46.6% 52.5% 38.8%
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% 2014 1/1 2.0 4.0 64.4% 70.1% 37.8% 61.5% 66.7% 58.7% 33.0%
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% 2015 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.5% 45.9% 47.1% 54.5% — 46.3% 20.0%
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 206/270 1.8 1.9 67.1% 58.3% 43.7% 48.0% 45.9% 53.2% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Sofia Arvidsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1490 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2002 1476 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2003 1482 105.7 — — — — +57 — — 36.4% 0.00 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.02
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1434 102.5 -0.81 -1.09 0.825 45.2% +52 — — 25.0% -1.75 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1599 123.9 +0.40 +0.57 1.145 52.4% +22 — — 58.7% +0.63 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.92
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2006 1536 114.6 +0.33 -0.03 1.057 51.0% +86 -78 +4 42.7% -0.64 5–2 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 +1.98
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2007 1507 107.1 -4.02 -1.30 0.886 47.3% +31 -34 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.06
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2008 1537 127.3 -1.18 +0.89 0.975 49.2% +65 -106 — 44.6% -0.43 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.15
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2009 1457 91.0 -4.02 -2.76 0.657 40.6% +57 — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.46
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2010 1550 118.4 -1.30 +0.07 0.984 49.7% +24 -80 — 44.3% -0.20 7–3 (70%) 1–3 (25%) 103.7 +0.17
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2011 1628 121.1 -2.81 -2.10 0.862 46.6% -43 -25 — 36.0% -0.99 9–3 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 112.3 -0.96
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 2012 1748 129.2 -1.39 +2.23 1.026 50.5% -15 -68 -277 53.1% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 +1.06
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 2013 1595 110.7 -2.33 -3.02 0.816 45.6% +53 -35 -186 28.6% -1.61 4–4 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -1.31
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 2014 1580 100.9 -3.45 -0.79 0.797 46.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 2015 1566 97.6 -0.28 -2.45 0.372 36.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1770 122.6 -1.79 -0.35 0.932 48.3% +28 -59 -161 41.3% -0.65 40–33 (55%) 25–25 (50%) 108.7 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.