H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 3-2

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–2 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2009 Wimbledon third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Nadia Petrova #10 3-6 6-3 6-4 Gisela Dulko #45 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-3 6-4 Gisela Dulko #44 Match data
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #6 6-1 6-2 Gisela Dulko #57 Match data
Jun 13, 2005 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Gisela Dulko #37 6-4 4-6 6-3 Nadia Petrova #8 Match data
Mar 13, 2004* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Gisela Dulko #97 6-3 6-3 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —