H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 3-2

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–2 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2009 Wimbledon third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #10 3-6 6-3 6-4 Gisela Dulko #45 Match data Jun 28, 2009* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Nadia Petrova #7 6-3 6-4 Gisela Dulko #44 Match data Mar 7, 2007* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nadia Petrova #6 6-1 6-2 Gisela Dulko #57 Match data Jan 18, 2007* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Gisela Dulko #37 6-4 4-6 6-3 Nadia Petrova #8 Match data Jun 18, 2005* QF Libéma Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Gisela Dulko #97 6-3 6-3 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data Mar 11, 2004* R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Gisela Dulko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Gisela Dulko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 —/— 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2%
19 —/— 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7%
20 —/— 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9%
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2%
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0%
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9%
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3%
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7%
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8%
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% —/—
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% —/—
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% —/—
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% —/—
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% —/—
Career 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Gisela Dulko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1536 108.3 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 -0.21 2001 1488 98.5 0.0% -3.00 -0.01
17 1999 1568 119.8 +27 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 -0.10 2002 1528 110.5 -9 +54 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) +0.54
18 2000 1625 137.4 +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47
19 2001 1683 138.0 -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94
20 2002 1745 137.3 -48 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 -1.69 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 -0.18
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.14
Career 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.