H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 5-4

Nadia Petrova holds a 5–4 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Maria Kirilenko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Tournament of Champions round-robin match 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 29, 2012 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Nadia Petrova #13 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #15 Match data
Mar 9, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Maria Kirilenko #23 6-1 5-7 6-2 Nadia Petrova #33 Match data
Aug 28, 2010* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Nadia Petrova #19 2-6 6-2 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data
Aug 16, 2008* Cincinnati WTA 500 SF Hard Nadia Petrova #21 1-6 6-2 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data
May 14, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Maria Kirilenko #26 3-6 7-5 6-4 Nadia Petrova #25 Match data
May 8, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Maria Kirilenko #27 6-3 6-3 Nadia Petrova #22 Match data
Feb 23, 2006* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Maria Kirilenko #23 6-4 6-1 Nadia Petrova #8 Match data
Jan 13, 2006* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #6 6-1 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data
Mar 26, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #11 6-2 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #117 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13