H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Podoroska vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-0

Nadia Podoroska holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Podoroska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2017 Monterrey Open first round 7-5 0-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Podoroska
Argentina Age 29 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Podoroska #191 7-5 0-6 6-3 Madison Brengle #100 Match data Apr 6, 2017* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Podoroska #449 #36 1,787 1,767 55 81 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Podoroska Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2016 0–3 0.0% #194 1,574 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2017 2–4 33.3% #311 1,608 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2018 1–1 50.0% #304 1,580 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2020 7–4 63.6% #47 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2021 17–17 50.0% #84 1,712 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2022 4–4 50.0% #195 1,660 0 0 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2023 13–18 41.9% #67 1,670 0 0 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2024 10–25 28.6% #100 1,643 0 0 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2025 0–1 0.0% #471 1,640 0 0 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2026 1–4 20.0% #449 1,613 0 0 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Podoroska Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2020 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2022 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 31 45 76 40.8% 19 28 47 40.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Podoroska Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2016 3/3 1.3 3.7 61.3% 57.4% 38.5% 38.6% 25.8% 50.0% 36.9% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2017 6/6 0.3 4.5 64.8% 46.8% 41.7% 37.2% 30.8% 44.6% 40.2% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2018 2/2 1.0 3.0 63.2% 53.8% 52.5% 51.8% 60.6% 53.4% 48.3% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2020 11/11 0.5 1.5 68.6% 52.6% 48.3% 49.7% 43.7% 51.2% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2021 31/34 2.5 3.7 61.1% 62.3% 46.9% 52.9% 43.9% 56.0% 45.6% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2022 8/8 1.5 5.3 63.1% 66.6% 45.4% 56.2% 44.3% 59.0% 42.8% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2023 31/31 1.8 4.1 61.7% 60.8% 42.9% 52.9% 56.4% 54.0% 40.8% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2024 34/35 1.6 3.4 65.4% 58.5% 40.2% 50.1% 40.3% 52.2% 40.3% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2026 5/5 2.2 4.6 66.0% 59.4% 50.2% 40.9% 17.3% 54.9% 36.7% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 131/136 1.7 3.7 63.5% 59.4% 44.0% 50.6% 44.1% 53.6% 42.2% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Podoroska Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2016 1575 106.0 -1.26 -1.72 0.738 43.2% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.22 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2017 1609 100.8 -4.92 -1.96 0.726 42.0% — -7 — 33.3% -1.92 2–0 — — -0.05 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2018 1581 102.9 -0.91 -1.28 1.037 51.0% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2019 1510 85.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2020 1737 123.1 -2.40 +1.52 0.955 49.0% -106 +39 — 56.0% +0.04 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2021 1713 130.1 -0.63 +2.06 1.037 50.8% -79 +84 -38 48.0% -0.13 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 105.0 +0.71 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2022 1660 105.0 +0.71 -0.89 1.044 50.7% -31 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.84 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2023 1670 120.5 -1.86 -1.71 0.886 47.7% -27 +84 -50 43.2% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.0 -0.19 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2024 1644 121.6 -3.46 -2.62 0.842 46.2% +35 -18 — 33.3% -1.16 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 93.1 -0.31 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2025 1641 106.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.25 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2026 1614 110.8 +1.33 -1.67 0.814 45.1% — — — 30.8% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.17 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1768 121.8 -1.86 -0.74 0.910 47.9% -29 +39 -44 41.7% -0.67 21–20 (51%) 14–13 (52%) 101.1 +0.15 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.