H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nadiia Kichenok vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 0-1
Anna Tatishvili holds a 1–0 lead over Nadiia Kichenok in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Tatishvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Tatishvili won the 2015 Quebec City third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2015* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Tatishvili | 6-2 6-4 | Nadiia Kichenok | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadiia Kichenok | #1,040 | #100 | 663 | 1,517 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadiia Kichenok | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |