H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Ana Bogdan H2H: 0-2
Ana Bogdan holds a 2–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ana Bogdan leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Bogdan won the 2023 Rome first round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 7-5 6-0 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2021 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2021* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 6-3 6-3 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2017 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 4-6 6-2 7-6(1) | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |