H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Bernarda Pera H2H: 1-1
Nao Hibino and Bernarda Pera are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on clay, while Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernarda Pera won the 2024 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2024 | Montreal | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Bernarda Pera | 2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| May 28, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 6-2 6-0 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nao Hibino | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |