H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 0-1
Maria Sharapova holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2016 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-1 6-3 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |