H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 16:36 UTC
Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Gasanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2026 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-2 | Anastasia Gasanova | Match data | Jul 1, 2026 | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,177 | 247 | 134 | 64.8% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Anastasia Gasanova | #195 | #121 | 631 | 1,615 | 12 | 16 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Anastasia Gasanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,909 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,044 | 2 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,109 | 3 | 6 | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #130 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,038 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #217 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,932 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,873 | 4 | 7 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,966 | 4 | 8 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 24–10 | 70.6% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Anastasia Gasanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 25 | 8 | 33 | 75.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2026 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 186 | 86 | 272 | 68.4% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | — | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/380 of Naomi Osaka's and 28/28 of Anastasia Gasanova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Anastasia Gasanova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 55/58 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% | 2021 | 15/15 | 1.3 | 7.2 | 70.0% | 58.4% | 41.7% | 49.2% | 46.7% | 53.4% | 46.1% |
| 23 | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% | 2022 | 10/10 | 1.7 | 7.3 | 64.3% | 57.7% | 42.9% | 44.7% | 45.7% | 52.1% | 42.9% |
| 24 | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% | 2025 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 61.3% | 25.8% | 53.9% | 46.2% | 49.5% | 46.2% |
| 27 | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% | 2026 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 86.1% | 56.6% | 54.8% | 60.7% | 46.2% | 56.6% | 40.1% |
| 28 | 2026 | 33/34 | 5.7 | 2.4 | 59.3% | 72.3% | 51.0% | 50.9% | 48.5% | 63.6% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 346/382 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 57.0% | 72.6% | 49.1% | 54.6% | 50.4% | 62.3% | 43.1% | — | 28/28 | 1.4 | 7.2 | 69.0% | 58.1% | 42.5% | 48.6% | 46.3% | 53.0% | 44.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Anastasia Gasanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.8 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +19 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | 2016 | 1466 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1699 | 128.1 | +3.17 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1696 | 131.9 | +1.31 | -2.13 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -85 | -46 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | -1.79 | 2018 | 1472 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1909 | 161.1 | +5.27 | +2.98 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +19 | -244 | -178 | 67.8% | +1.40 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | -2.05 | 2019 | 1462 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 2045 | 154.3 | +5.82 | +1.72 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +32 | -228 | -345 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | -0.36 | 2020 | 1448 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 2110 | 155.9 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +18 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | -0.45 | 2021 | 1574 | 118.5 | -1.70 | +0.64 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +61 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.03 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–2 (60%) | +0.37 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2038 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -232 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | -0.09 | 2022 | 1562 | 113.1 | -2.50 | -0.03 | 0.895 | 47.4% | -18 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | +0.01 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1933 | 147.9 | +4.78 | +0.06 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -154 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +75 | -99 | -153 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | -2.07 | 2025 | 1604 | 110.1 | -2.57 | +3.10 | 0.915 | 47.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–2 | -0.23 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1967 | 153.5 | +4.79 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +58 | -127 | -252 | 65.4% | +1.12 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | +0.96 | 2026 | 1576 | — | +0.24 | +0.90 | 0.924 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 2045 | 155.9 | +5.49 | +1.22 | 1.178 | 53.3% | -10 | -100 | -113 | 67.6% | +1.22 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–3 (63%) | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2177 | 156.7 | +4.76 | +0.87 | 1.145 | 52.7% | +36 | -157 | -156 | 62.8% | +0.97 | 68–36 (65%) | 45–45 (50%) | -2.12 | — | 1615 | 115.6 | -1.88 | +0.51 | 0.948 | 48.9% | +36 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.38 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | +0.58 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 6 | 4 | 10 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 1, 2026 | H2H |
| Emiliana Arango | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Linda Noskova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 22, 2025 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 23, 2022 | H2H |
| Astra Sharma | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 22, 2022 | H2H |