H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 1-2
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–1 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2019 Beijing semifinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-4 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2017* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-2 7-6(5) | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2016* | Toray Pan Pacific Open | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 7-5 6-3 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |