H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Danka Kovinic

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Naomi Osaka vs Danka Kovinic.

Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 0
0 main-draw meetings
Montenegro Age 31 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #51 6-3 6-1 Danka Kovinic #122 Match data Feb 11, 2018 Q2 Q Qatar Open Premier 5 modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Danka Kovinic #1,327 #46 1,312 1,755 85 124 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Danka Kovinic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2013 2–2 50.0% #168 1,511 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2014 6–12 33.3% #109 1,458 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2015 16–13 55.2% #57 1,611 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2016 18–23 43.9% #71 1,571 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2017 3–16 15.8% #121 1,452 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2018 3–5 37.5% #154 1,517 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2019 2–3 40.0% #85 1,566 0 0
25 2020 5–7 41.7% #77 1,633 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2021 12–17 41.4% #96 1,586 0 0
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2022 9–11 45.0% #60 1,685 0 0
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2023 8–11 42.1% #150 1,628 0 0
29 2024 0–1 0.0% #1327 1,621 0 0
30 2025 1–1 50.0% 1,608 0 0
31 2026 0–2 0.0% #1327 1,542 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Danka Kovinic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0%
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0%
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 5 5 10 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 8 14 22 36.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% 2017 2 10 12 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2020 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2023 5 7 12 41.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2024 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2025 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2026 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% 35 72 107 32.7% 50 46 96 52.1% 0 6 6 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 188/207 of Danka Kovinic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Danka Kovinic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% —/—
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2013 2/4 5.0 5.5 55.0% 57.3% 52.0% 65.2% 50.0% 55.9% 45.4%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2014 14/18 3.7 5.7 51.1% 67.8% 44.2% 54.0% 43.4% 56.2% 40.3%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2015 20/29 4.3 4.0 56.8% 65.8% 53.1% 48.2% 46.4% 60.0% 38.8%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2016 38/41 3.0 3.7 52.2% 65.7% 48.0% 54.6% 50.3% 57.6% 41.9%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2017 19/19 3.5 4.1 53.8% 59.7% 40.7% 52.5% 41.1% 51.0% 39.9%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2018 8/8 1.9 3.8 54.9% 62.5% 40.5% 42.1% 40.9% 52.7% 39.4%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2019 5/5 2.4 7.4 59.7% 60.2% 42.0% 55.2% 63.4% 52.9% 43.8%
25 —/— 2020 12/12 3.0 5.0 58.4% 69.7% 41.9% 54.5% 47.4% 59.0% 39.8%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2021 29/30 2.4 4.6 52.5% 59.1% 43.8% 43.4% 54.5% 51.8% 41.9%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2022 20/20 3.0 4.9 51.6% 62.2% 41.5% 52.7% 46.6% 52.1% 39.4%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2023 19/19 3.5 4.6 57.7% 64.5% 42.4% 50.2% 54.5% 54.6% 43.3%
31 —/— 2026 2/2 1.0 5.5 59.9% 45.3% 25.1% 12.5% 54.8% 37.4% 42.0%
Career 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% 188/210 3.1 4.5 54.1% 63.4% 44.5% 50.4% 48.9% 54.8% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Danka Kovinic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 -0.19
17 2015 1509 102.0 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0.00
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2013 1512 105.6 -0.09 -0.79 1.028 50.4% +61 45.5% +0.18 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.28
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2014 1459 99.7 -1.02 -2.74 0.921 48.4% -5 +95 38.6% -0.52 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 94.1 +1.27
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2015 1611 119.5 +1.23 -1.90 0.970 49.1% -90 +28 52.3% +0.22 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) 105.0 -0.31
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2016 1571 121.1 +1.05 -0.55 0.987 49.9% -60 +117 46.2% -0.26 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.03
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2017 1453 98.5 -3.39 -2.67 0.813 45.8% +3 +129 18.4% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–8 (0%) 91.9 +0.40
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2018 1518 106.0 -1.79 -2.54 0.832 45.9% +59 36.8% -1.32 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.15
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 -0.62 2019 1566 103.9 -0.76 -0.72 0.932 49.2% -43 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.20
25 2020 1633 123.6 +1.55 -0.81 0.969 49.6% -122 +85 46.4% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) -0.18
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2021 1587 117.6 -3.32 -0.37 0.869 46.9% -131 +176 41.0% -0.95 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -1.02
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2022 1686 120.8 -2.62 -1.70 0.821 46.1% -179 +154 40.4% -0.91 6–1 (86%) 0–3 (0%) 105.3 -0.27
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2023 1628 123.5 -2.04 -0.40 0.953 49.1% -99 +136 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–1 -0.17
29 2024 1621 98.2 0.0% -5.50 -0.08
30 2025 1609 100.3 50.0% -1.50 +0.25
31 2026 1542 98.8 -1.17 -0.84 0.671 39.7% 0.0% -3.75 0.00
Career 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 1756 118.4 -1.08 -1.26 0.906 48.0% -79 +104 41.8% -0.55 33–29 (53%) 11–26 (30%) 99.6 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.