H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:33 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Daria Kasatkina H2H: 4-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 4–0 lead over Daria Kasatkina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2026 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Naomi Osaka | 6-1 6-3 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
| May 12, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-3 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
| Mar 18, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-2 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Daria Kasatkina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 |