H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2020 Cincinnati Open third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-1 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Aug 26, 2020* | R16 | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,179 | 250 | 137 | 64.6% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2018 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,902 | 1 | 2 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,047 | 2 | 5 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,111 | 3 | 6 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,040 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,933 | 4 | 7 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,872 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,959 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 27–11 | 71.1% | #13 | 2,051 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2018 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2025 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 189 | 89 | 278 | 68.0% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% |
| 18 | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% |
| 19 | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% |
| 20 | 2018 | 55/60 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% |
| 22 | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% |
| 23 | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% |
| 24 | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% |
| 26 | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% |
| 27 | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 37/38 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 58.2% | 72.9% | 49.6% | 52.0% | 47.3% | 63.2% | 42.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 350/388 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 56.9% | 72.6% | 48.9% | 54.7% | 50.3% | 62.3% | 43.1% | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.5 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +17 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 17 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1700 | 128.3 | +3.18 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.0 | +0.04 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1696 | 132.1 | +1.30 | -2.12 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -84 | -47 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.8 | -1.51 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1902 | 160.7 | +5.21 | +2.94 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +17 | -236 | -168 | 67.5% | +1.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.8 | -2.09 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2047 | 154.9 | +5.80 | +1.63 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +30 | -229 | -350 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | 116.1 | +0.60 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2112 | 156.0 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +19 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.1 | -0.42 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2040 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -235 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.5 | -0.04 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1934 | 147.8 | +4.77 | +0.02 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -156 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.05 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +76 | -98 | -157 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.1 | -2.05 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -46 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1960 | 153.1 | +4.79 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +52 | -122 | -247 | 65.1% | +1.10 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 102.1 | +0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 2051 | 158.1 | +5.15 | +1.24 | 1.160 | 53.0% | -4 | -102 | -109 | 66.7% | +1.12 | 8–2 (80%) | 7–3 (70%) | 109.2 | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2179 | 157.0 | +4.72 | +0.85 | 1.143 | 52.6% | +34 | -156 | -154 | 62.7% | +0.95 | 70–37 (65%) | 48–45 (52%) | 107.2 | -1.63 | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.89 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 7 | 4 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |