H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Donna Vekic H2H: 3-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 3–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2026 Roland Garros second round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2019* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |