H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Jelena Ostapenko H2H: 3-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 3–0 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 Montreal third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-2 6-4 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 6-4 7-5 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Jelena Ostapenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 |