H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 1-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Johanna Larsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2017 Charleston Open first round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Johanna Larsson
Sweden Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #49 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 Johanna Larsson #57 Match data Apr 5, 2017* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Johanna Larsson #67 6-2 2-2 (ret.) Naomi Osaka #82 Match data Aug 19, 2016 Q1 Q New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 250 137 64.6% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Johanna Larsson #236 #45 1,230 1,733 153 178 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Johanna Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #389 1,502 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #177 1,509 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2009 0–2 0.0% #172 1,492 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2010 9–9 50.0% #69 1,555 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2011 19–18 51.4% #59 1,666 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2012 14–19 42.4% #73 1,624 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2013 13–16 44.8% #84 1,624 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2014 7–15 31.8% #70 1,596 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2015 25–19 56.8% #56 1,668 0 1
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2016 29–25 53.7% #50 1,707 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,051 4 7 2017 15–21 41.7% #80 1,623 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2018 17–18 48.6% #75 1,599 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2019 3–13 18.8% #217 1,557 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #236 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Johanna Larsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 19 15 34 55.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 7 8 12.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 189 89 278 68.0% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 78 100 178 43.8% 72 62 134 53.7% 3 15 18 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 295/330 of Johanna Larsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Johanna Larsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2008 2/2 3.0 2.5 44.9% 79.7% 47.8% 53.3% 12.5% 62.4% 34.1%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2009 2/2 3.0 5.0 52.5% 63.7% 45.6% 41.9% 45.5% 55.2% 41.4%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2010 16/18 3.0 2.8 60.5% 67.0% 45.2% 65.3% 43.3% 58.2% 42.3%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2011 32/37 1.8 3.3 61.4% 59.4% 44.9% 49.2% 48.7% 53.7% 43.6%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2012 30/33 2.2 3.4 59.5% 58.3% 45.2% 49.6% 46.8% 52.6% 41.5%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2013 24/29 2.0 3.0 63.8% 61.0% 44.1% 51.3% 37.7% 55.0% 39.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 18/22 1.5 3.3 71.1% 56.8% 43.4% 47.0% 43.4% 53.0% 40.0%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2015 30/44 1.5 2.9 69.7% 59.8% 54.4% 50.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2016 53/55 2.3 3.6 63.4% 60.9% 45.5% 49.9% 47.1% 55.3% 43.8%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2017 36/36 1.4 3.5 67.2% 59.2% 43.0% 50.3% 38.8% 53.9% 41.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 35/35 1.8 3.8 62.2% 60.7% 45.9% 50.0% 41.9% 55.0% 42.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.5 3.2 64.3% 55.9% 42.5% 50.7% 41.2% 51.1% 34.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 0.0 3.0 65.0% 42.3% 35.7% 50.0% 0.0% 40.0% 30.4%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 295/332 1.9 3.3 64.0% 60.0% 45.6% 50.7% 44.2% 54.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Johanna Larsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2006 1503 104.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.16
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2008 1510 100.9 +0.29 -1.15 0.907 46.1% — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 1–0 — +0.06
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2009 1493 103.2 -0.43 -1.92 0.925 48.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2010 1555 121.7 +0.59 -1.39 1.013 50.2% +38 -47 — 47.1% -0.15 0–2 2–3 (40%) — +0.25
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2011 1666 118.5 -1.99 -0.93 0.942 48.7% -78 -7 -63 48.2% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.7 -0.99
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2012 1625 112.1 -1.63 -2.02 0.876 47.3% -42 +36 — 39.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 5–1 (83%) 101.4 +0.21
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2013 1624 121.5 -0.43 -2.79 0.877 47.2% -56 +95 — 42.4% -0.42 6–2 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 -1.47
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1596 123.3 -2.35 -1.81 0.853 46.6% -12 +47 — 32.7% -0.78 3–2 (60%) 1–6 (14%) 98.3 -1.78
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2015 1668 125.8 -0.89 +0.77 1.028 50.4% -9 +58 -181 54.9% +0.21 3–4 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 +0.01
27 2025 1960 153.1 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +52 -122 -247 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +0.96 2016 1708 126.0 -0.78 +0.26 0.982 49.7% +5 +2 — 54.4% -0.04 9–10 (47%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.87
28 2026 2051 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% -3 -102 -109 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.2 -0.78 2017 1624 122.5 -2.11 -1.71 0.896 47.6% +12 +71 — 43.2% -0.48 6–5 (55%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.48
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1600 119.2 -1.77 -0.96 0.947 48.7% -13 +94 -110 47.0% -0.55 8–7 (53%) 9–1 (90%) 111.4 -1.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1558 102.9 -3.75 -5.03 0.710 43.5% -46 +116 — 18.8% -2.53 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -1.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1544 90.5 +0.79 -0.26 0.507 34.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.14
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +34 -156 -154 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.2 -1.63 — 1733 124.4 -1.43 -1.21 0.922 48.2% -15 +46 -113 45.3% -0.47 49–44 (53%) 42–38 (53%) 106.7 -2.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.