H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-1

Naomi Osaka and Julia Goerges are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2018 China Open third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #6 6-1 6-2 Julia Goerges #10 Match data Oct 4, 2018 R16 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Julia Goerges #13 7-6(4) 6-3 Naomi Osaka #21 Match data Apr 6, 2018* R16 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Naomi Osaka #84 6-4 6-4 Julia Goerges #64 Match data Aug 13, 2016 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Julia Goerges
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 524/562 of Julia Goerges's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Julia Goerges
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Julia Goerges
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.