H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC
Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2026 Canadian Open fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 6-4 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data | Aug 9, 2026 | R16 | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Naomi Osaka | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data | Oct 7, 2025 | R64 | Wuhan Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Leylah Fernandez | 5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data | Sep 4, 2021* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #18 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,178 | 253 | 139 | 64.5% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #23 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,939 | 167 | 128 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,816 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2018 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,902 | 1 | 2 | 2023 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,046 | 2 | 5 | 2024 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #31 | 1,869 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,111 | 3 | 6 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,912 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,039 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,933 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,872 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,959 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #18 | 2,030 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2022 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2023 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2024 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 23 | 15 | 38 | 60.5% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 192 | 91 | 283 | 67.8% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | — | 123 | 84 | 207 | 59.4% | 29 | 29 | 58 | 50.0% | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 355/391 of Naomi Osaka's and 271/298 of Leylah Fernandez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 57.8% | 73.9% | 52.3% | 61.9% | 25.0% | 65.0% | 35.6% |
| 16 | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% | 2019 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 55.5% | 39.2% | 47.1% | 25.0% | 48.8% | 32.4% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 17/17 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 61.7% | 63.9% | 49.2% | 52.2% | 51.0% | 58.3% | 44.9% |
| 18 | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% | 2021 | 33/35 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 64.2% | 63.5% | 48.3% | 58.0% | 48.9% | 58.2% | 43.5% |
| 19 | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% | 2022 | 29/29 | 2.3 | 4.2 | 64.9% | 65.4% | 48.0% | 58.8% | 43.6% | 59.2% | 40.0% |
| 20 | 2018 | 55/60 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% | 2023 | 47/48 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 63.0% | 67.8% | 49.0% | 53.9% | 48.9% | 61.0% | 44.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% | 2024 | 50/54 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 64.9% | 66.0% | 47.0% | 55.5% | 47.6% | 59.3% | 44.2% |
| 22 | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% | 2025 | 37/53 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 62.3% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 55.9% | 43.5% | 60.3% | 43.5% |
| 23 | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% | 2026 | 54/58 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 63.0% | 66.1% | 47.6% | 59.4% | 44.9% | 59.4% | 42.4% |
| 24 | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 42/43 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 58.6% | 72.8% | 49.3% | 54.5% | 46.9% | 63.1% | 42.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 355/393 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 57.0% | 72.6% | 48.9% | 54.8% | 50.2% | 62.3% | 43.0% | — | 271/298 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 66.0% | 48.0% | 56.5% | 46.3% | 59.5% | 43.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1499 | 100.0 | -0.12 | -1.78 | 1.014 | 50.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | +0.37 |
| 16 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.6 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +17 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | 2019 | 1472 | 93.0 | -1.04 | -1.61 | 0.633 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.38 |
| 17 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 | 2020 | 1683 | 135.1 | +0.76 | +1.49 | 1.077 | 51.6% | +1 | -111 | — | 56.4% | +0.56 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.8 | -0.37 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1700 | 133.1 | +3.18 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.0 | +0.04 | 2021 | 1817 | 141.4 | +1.54 | +0.39 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +33 | -268 | -198 | 56.8% | +0.43 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–3 (63%) | 108.5 | +0.22 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1696 | 132.1 | +1.30 | -2.12 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -84 | -46 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.8 | -1.51 | 2022 | 1799 | 140.8 | +2.24 | -1.39 | 0.982 | 49.8% | -3 | -109 | — | 50.0% | +0.09 | 8–4 (67%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.8 | -0.56 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1902 | 160.7 | +5.21 | +2.94 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +17 | -236 | -168 | 67.5% | +1.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.8 | -2.09 | 2023 | 1830 | 142.4 | +3.34 | +1.19 | 1.130 | 52.5% | +28 | -212 | -213 | 56.7% | +0.51 | 5–9 (36%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.0 | +0.40 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2047 | 154.9 | +5.80 | +1.63 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +30 | -229 | -350 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | 116.1 | +0.63 | 2024 | 1870 | 152.2 | +2.00 | +1.26 | 1.084 | 51.7% | -12 | -167 | -39 | 54.8% | +0.57 | 12–10 (55%) | 8–4 (67%) | 107.2 | +0.09 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2112 | 156.0 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +18 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.1 | -0.43 | 2025 | 1912 | 152.4 | +2.92 | +1.14 | 1.097 | 51.7% | +45 | -265 | -123 | 56.2% | +0.45 | 7–8 (47%) | 9–8 (53%) | 97.8 | +0.21 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2040 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -235 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.5 | -0.04 | 2026 | 1940 | 152.1 | +1.89 | +0.47 | 1.044 | 51.2% | +46 | -238 | -228 | 53.4% | +0.45 | 11–8 (58%) | 4–12 (25%) | 97.5 | +1.58 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1934 | 147.9 | +4.77 | +0.02 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -156 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +76 | -98 | -157 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.1 | -2.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1959 | 153.2 | +4.80 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +53 | -121 | -236 | 65.1% | +1.10 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 102.1 | +1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 2030 | 160.5 | +5.23 | +0.68 | 1.144 | 52.8% | -1 | -84 | -91 | 66.3% | +1.11 | 9–3 (75%) | 9–4 (69%) | 109.8 | -0.99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2179 | 158.0 | +4.73 | +0.79 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +34 | -153 | -148 | 62.7% | +0.95 | 71–38 (65%) | 50–46 (52%) | 107.7 | -1.65 | — | 1940 | 151.8 | +2.19 | +0.66 | 1.064 | 51.3% | +24 | -196 | -132 | 54.7% | +0.43 | 53–46 (54%) | 39–40 (49%) | 104.3 | +0.79 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 7 | 4 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | 3 | 4 | 7 | Oct 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Mirra Andreeva | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 4, 2026 | H2H |