H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 1-1
Naomi Osaka and Leylah Fernandez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 Wuhan second round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |