H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Magda Linette H2H: 2-1

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2019 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Magda Linette
Poland Age 34 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #1 6-2 6-4 Magda Linette #53 Match data Aug 29, 2019* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 6-4 6-2 Magda Linette #80 Match data Jan 16, 2019* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Magda Linette #62 6-2 3-6 6-3 Naomi Osaka #17 Match data Aug 3, 2018* R16 Washington Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Magda Linette #82 #19 1,921 1,863 221 234 48.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Magda Linette
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 — — — — — — —
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2013 4–2 66.7% #123 1,535 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,517 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2015 9–11 45.0% #90 1,576 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2016 10–16 38.5% #96 1,583 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2017 17–23 42.5% #72 1,727 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2018 15–18 45.5% #81 1,601 0 0
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2019 24–18 57.1% #43 1,781 0 2
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2020 11–11 50.0% #40 1,722 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2021 16–17 48.5% #57 1,763 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2022 23–22 51.1% #48 1,719 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2023 24–24 50.0% #24 1,732 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2024 28–26 51.9% #38 1,830 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2025 19–24 44.2% #54 1,742 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2026 19–18 51.4% #82 1,743 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Magda Linette
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 10 15 25 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2018 13 11 24 54.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2019 20 11 31 64.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 16 16 32 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 16 27 40.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 13 17 30 43.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 13 13 26 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 150 156 306 49.0% 50 50 100 50.0% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 421/457 of Magda Linette's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Magda Linette
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2013 4/6 0.5 1.8 72.3% 53.8% 53.4% 29.2% 46.4% 54.1% 42.2%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2014 4/6 3.8 4.8 57.4% 64.6% 42.5% 71.4% 31.7% 55.7% 43.7%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2015 10/20 2.3 3.3 63.7% 62.2% 50.9% 51.9% 48.3% 58.0% 40.1%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2016 25/26 2.2 3.5 62.7% 62.0% 44.8% 47.4% 37.4% 55.3% 39.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 40/40 2.6 2.5 67.9% 63.5% 46.3% 43.8% 40.5% 57.7% 41.5%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2018 30/33 2.3 3.8 63.5% 62.1% 46.1% 50.1% 47.8% 55.9% 42.4%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2019 40/42 4.0 2.9 57.0% 66.2% 48.4% 55.6% 51.6% 58.7% 43.3%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2020 22/22 2.4 3.2 60.8% 65.8% 44.0% 49.4% 45.6% 57.5% 41.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 31/33 3.5 3.0 62.0% 68.2% 45.1% 51.6% 51.1% 59.3% 43.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 45/45 3.5 2.6 63.9% 65.5% 49.5% 52.4% 42.2% 59.7% 42.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 48/49 2.5 1.8 67.0% 62.0% 48.8% 45.6% 46.1% 57.4% 41.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 52/54 3.3 1.9 61.7% 65.2% 47.9% 58.0% 46.4% 58.4% 41.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 36/44 3.8 2.4 59.8% 63.1% 45.8% 55.3% 42.3% 55.8% 39.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 34/37 3.3 2.1 57.6% 63.9% 46.1% 43.9% 40.4% 56.3% 39.6%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 421/457 3.1 2.6 62.4% 64.2% 47.1% 50.6% 44.8% 57.6% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Magda Linette
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2013 1536 102.2 -1.11 -2.42 0.920 48.0% +21 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.79
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2014 1518 109.9 -1.03 -1.10 0.986 49.6% +15 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–2 — — +0.11
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2015 1576 118.7 -0.76 -1.01 0.955 49.2% +15 — +23 50.0% -0.26 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -0.29
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2016 1583 116.6 -0.13 -2.61 0.875 48.3% +3 — -35 36.2% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.02
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1728 126.9 +1.02 -1.27 0.983 49.5% +21 -159 -224 44.6% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 +0.07
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2018 1601 117.5 -0.12 -0.67 0.960 49.1% +33 -43 — 46.2% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 +0.76
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2019 1782 135.1 +1.80 +0.35 1.048 51.1% +25 -283 -262 53.6% +0.20 9–6 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 108.4 -0.23
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2020 1723 127.0 +0.87 -1.08 0.968 49.2% +28 -204 — 50.0% +0.06 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.72
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1764 135.6 +2.54 +1.11 1.068 51.3% -9 -174 -225 52.7% 0.00 3–11 (21%) 4–1 (80%) 95.7 -1.54
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1719 132.3 +2.26 -0.34 1.061 50.9% +7 -34 -131 49.5% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.37
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1732 137.3 +0.60 -0.62 0.977 49.5% +15 -77 -90 46.8% -0.20 10–7 (59%) 6–10 (38%) 101.1 -0.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1830 141.2 +1.60 -0.83 1.002 50.2% -97 +38 -210 52.8% +0.07 9–12 (43%) 9–6 (60%) 100.0 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1742 140.4 -0.56 -2.21 0.896 47.9% -16 +96 -155 44.8% -0.53 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 +0.26
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1743 135.6 -0.18 -1.88 0.907 48.0% -30 +88 -68 45.6% -0.20 13–3 (81%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 -0.01
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1863 136.6 +0.89 -0.87 0.980 49.6% -1 -62 -137 48.0% -0.17 82–79 (51%) 70–49 (59%) 109.8 -0.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.