H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Mia Pohankova

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Naomi Osaka vs Mia Pohankova.

Japan Age 29 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka Scheduled Mia Pohankova Match data Oct 29, 2026 R16 Pan Pacific Open WTA 500 Hard

Scheduled and live matches do not affect the H2H record until recorded as complete. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #18 #1 7,985 2,178 253 138 64.7% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Mia Pohankova #144 #144 504 1,663 6 3 66.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Mia Pohankova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2025 2–1 66.7% — 1,525 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,509 0 0 2026 4–2 66.7% #144 1,663 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 — — — — — — —
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,046 2 5 — — — — — — —
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 — — — — — — —
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,039 4 7 — — — — — — —
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 — — — — — — —
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 — — — — — — —
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 — — — — — — —
28 2026 30–12 71.4% #18 2,059 4 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Mia Pohankova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2026 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 15 7 22 68.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 192 90 282 68.1% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Mia Pohankova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.6 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2025 1526 106.7 — — — — +28 — — 66.7% +0.67 — — — +0.27
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2026 1663 114.9 +0.68 +1.07 1.085 52.3% +31 — — 61.5% +0.69 1–0 1–1 — +0.14
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -46 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +18 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 1934 147.9 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 1959 153.2 +4.80 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +53 -121 -236 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 2059 160.0 +5.34 +0.83 1.153 53.0% +2 -112 -119 67.0% +1.13 9–3 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 109.8 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2179 157.2 +4.74 +0.81 1.143 52.6% +34 -158 -154 62.8% +0.95 71–38 (65%) 50–46 (52%) 107.7 -1.69 — 1663 111.5 +0.68 +1.07 1.085 52.3% +30 — — 63.2% +0.68 1–0 1–1 — +4.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.