H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Misaki Doi H2H: 3-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 3–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2021 Madrid second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 7-5 6-2 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2016* | Toray Pan Pacific Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-4 6-4 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Misaki Doi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |