H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 2-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Kvitova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2019 WTA Finals round robin 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
Czech Republic Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #3 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4 Petra Kvitova #6 Match data Oct 27, 2019 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 7-6(2) 5-7 6-4 Petra Kvitova #6 Match data Jan 26, 2019* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,074 515 262 66.3% 2 9 2 14 4 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,702 0 1
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,701 0 1
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,059 1 7
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2012 41–16 71.9% #8 1,960 1 9
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,962 1 11
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,982 2 14
25 — — — — — — — 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,908 2 17
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2016 46–20 69.7% #11 1,990 2 19
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,902 2 20
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2018 43–18 70.5% #7 1,896 2 25
29 — — — — — — — 2019 37–16 69.8% #7 1,914 2 27
30 — — — — — — — 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,964 2 27
31 — — — — — — — 2021 29–18 61.7% #17 1,888 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,913 2 29
33 — — — — — — — 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,923 2 31
35 — — — — — — — 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,767 2 31

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Petra Kvitova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2009 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 25 9 34 73.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 24 9 33 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 33 14 47 70.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 22 12 34 64.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 36 13 49 73.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 26 13 39 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 15 6 21 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 11 29 62.1% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 20 13 33 60.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 21 10 31 67.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 333 178 511 65.2% 100 54 154 64.9% 75 27 102 73.5% 7 3 10 70.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 700/776 of Petra Kvitova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Petra Kvitova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2008 24/27 3.0 5.3 63.7% 63.6% 47.7% 46.7% 53.6% 57.6% 45.7%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2009 30/34 1.8 5.1 59.8% 60.5% 45.4% 55.0% 48.3% 54.5% 47.3%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2010 35/37 2.8 4.7 62.7% 64.0% 44.8% 52.6% 50.6% 56.9% 42.7%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2011 56/61 3.8 3.5 61.7% 69.6% 52.2% 58.0% 49.5% 62.8% 45.6%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2012 51/57 3.5 3.5 63.9% 69.6% 51.7% 55.0% 48.8% 63.1% 47.0%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2013 68/71 3.6 5.2 62.7% 64.2% 47.5% 58.9% 51.8% 57.9% 44.3%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2014 52/58 4.9 4.1 62.0% 71.2% 51.8% 54.1% 46.7% 63.8% 45.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 38/51 4.2 3.6 63.4% 73.6% 54.7% 56.3% 49.5% 66.5% 42.6%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2016 57/66 3.8 4.2 61.7% 70.6% 50.9% 56.2% 49.0% 62.8% 45.5%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2017 28/28 5.6 5.9 58.0% 74.6% 47.5% 51.2% 46.1% 63.3% 43.9%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2018 55/61 4.4 5.7 59.9% 70.0% 49.7% 60.8% 50.3% 61.8% 45.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 45/53 4.9 4.2 61.9% 71.7% 52.0% 60.5% 44.4% 64.4% 44.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 26/27 4.8 4.2 63.5% 69.7% 53.3% 54.9% 46.8% 63.5% 46.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 42/47 4.5 3.9 64.0% 68.8% 49.7% 62.5% 46.2% 61.9% 44.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 46/47 5.1 4.9 63.0% 68.6% 47.4% 61.8% 52.7% 60.6% 41.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 40/42 5.3 5.5 62.7% 70.6% 47.6% 53.6% 50.3% 61.8% 43.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 7/9 3.1 6.0 63.8% 55.9% 35.9% 46.9% 56.2% 48.7% 36.5%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 700/777 4.1 4.6 62.2% 68.8% 49.6% 56.7% 49.2% 61.5% 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Petra Kvitova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2007 1485 98.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2008 1608 130.9 +1.66 +1.28 1.077 51.5% -18 +7 — 50.0% +0.12 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 -0.04
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2009 1703 133.5 -0.27 +2.91 1.039 50.9% +7 -102 — 48.6% +0.10 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.83
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2010 1702 137.8 +1.40 +0.05 0.989 49.8% -21 -143 -22 45.0% -0.47 4–5 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 100.1 -2.15
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2011 2060 158.0 +7.08 +2.42 1.227 54.1% -93 -295 -101 74.3% +1.54 13–5 (72%) 13–7 (65%) 109.8 -3.06
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2012 1960 153.8 +6.34 +3.52 1.273 54.6% +3 -103 -2 66.4% +1.26 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +1.48
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2013 1963 151.5 +2.63 +1.47 1.052 51.1% +38 -108 +7 61.3% +0.64 23–12 (66%) 9–7 (56%) 102.8 +2.65
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2014 1982 155.2 +6.82 +2.91 1.250 54.4% -16 -166 +99 66.9% +1.31 10–7 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 103.3 +2.20
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1908 152.2 +7.08 +1.73 1.269 54.3% -11 -15 +115 64.4% +1.07 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 95.4 +0.55
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2016 1990 155.9 +6.43 +2.58 1.224 54.2% +26 -112 -49 67.1% +1.38 11–9 (55%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 -0.37
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2017 1903 140.4 +4.94 +1.34 1.195 53.1% +28 — +99 63.9% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 92.8 -0.22
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2018 1896 151.5 +4.70 +3.13 1.203 53.8% -27 +81 +127 64.7% +1.07 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1914 163.0 +6.74 +2.67 1.245 54.0% -18 +139 +129 68.6% +1.29 8–9 (47%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 -0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1965 151.9 +5.00 +3.29 1.269 54.5% -21 +92 — 70.5% +1.49 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.7 +0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1889 149.5 +4.60 +1.74 1.160 53.1% +19 +158 +227 63.1% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 94.2 +1.06
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1913 149.9 +3.47 -0.04 1.055 51.1% +11 +3 +252 57.3% +0.48 10–5 (67%) 11–8 (58%) 104.8 -0.28
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1924 152.8 +4.16 +0.64 1.127 52.2% +25 — +314 64.4% +0.86 6–4 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 101.6 +0.31
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1768 106.1 -3.70 -3.58 0.711 43.0% +76 +18 — 27.3% -1.50 0–4 (0%) — — +0.07
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 2074 157.9 +4.70 +1.98 1.158 52.9% -3 -35 +84 62.9% +0.91 148–108 (58%) 112–84 (57%) 101.7 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.