H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC
Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2019 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 6-2 6-4 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | Jan 17, 2019* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #18 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,178 | 253 | 139 | 64.5% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Tamara Zidansek | #141 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,804 | 80 | 91 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,902 | 1 | 2 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,046 | 2 | 5 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,111 | 3 | 6 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,039 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,933 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,872 | 4 | 7 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,959 | 4 | 7 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #18 | 2,030 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2019 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2026 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 192 | 91 | 283 | 67.8% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | — | 34 | 52 | 86 | 39.5% | 42 | 32 | 74 | 56.8% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 355/391 of Naomi Osaka's and 165/170 of Tamara Zidansek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 68.3% | 46.5% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 49.2% | 38.9% |
| 20 | 2018 | 55/60 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 65.4% | 57.7% | 42.3% | 44.7% | 51.2% | 52.5% | 48.6% |
| 21 | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% | 2019 | 33/33 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 68.5% | 58.2% | 42.0% | 53.9% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 42.8% |
| 22 | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% | 2020 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 68.3% | 59.5% | 47.5% | 55.0% | 48.5% | 55.6% | 43.3% |
| 23 | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% | 2021 | 41/43 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 64.9% | 62.8% | 45.6% | 49.4% | 50.9% | 56.7% | 45.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% | 2022 | 30/32 | 1.3 | 3.6 | 63.1% | 61.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 48.5% | 54.3% | 41.4% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14/14 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 68.0% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 54.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% |
| 26 | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% | 2024 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 57.8% | 38.8% | 46.4% | 36.2% | 51.2% | 40.2% |
| 27 | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 42/43 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 58.6% | 72.8% | 49.3% | 54.5% | 46.9% | 63.1% | 42.2% | 2026 | 7/8 | 1.6 | 5.3 | 58.7% | 62.2% | 43.3% | 51.5% | 59.2% | 54.1% | 48.8% |
| Career | — | 355/393 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 57.0% | 72.6% | 48.9% | 54.8% | 50.2% | 62.3% | 43.0% | — | 165/171 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 65.6% | 59.8% | 43.6% | 50.7% | 48.9% | 54.1% | 44.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.6 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +17 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1700 | 133.1 | +3.18 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.0 | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1696 | 132.1 | +1.30 | -2.12 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -84 | -46 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.8 | -1.51 | 2017 | 1484 | 98.5 | -0.11 | -0.64 | 0.766 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1902 | 160.7 | +5.21 | +2.94 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +17 | -236 | -168 | 67.5% | +1.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.8 | -2.09 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.1 | -1.96 | +2.38 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -117 | +98 | — | 55.2% | +0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2047 | 154.9 | +5.80 | +1.63 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +30 | -229 | -350 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | 116.1 | +0.63 | 2019 | 1646 | 114.7 | -2.77 | -0.58 | 0.912 | 48.3% | -139 | +156 | -12 | 43.8% | -0.58 | 9–7 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.4 | -0.08 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2112 | 156.0 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +18 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.1 | -0.43 | 2020 | 1615 | 128.8 | -0.74 | +0.40 | 0.974 | 49.8% | -67 | +144 | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.0 | -0.45 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2040 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -235 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.5 | -0.04 | 2021 | 1727 | 132.9 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -162 | +230 | — | 54.1% | +0.16 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.1 | +0.90 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1934 | 147.9 | +4.77 | +0.02 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -156 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 | 2022 | 1596 | 120.1 | -1.76 | -0.99 | 0.907 | 47.9% | +16 | +122 | -18 | 41.7% | -0.61 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.49 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1678 | 119.9 | -2.90 | +0.63 | 0.942 | 48.6% | -80 | +130 | — | 48.5% | -0.64 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | -0.10 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +76 | -98 | -157 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.1 | -2.05 | 2024 | 1638 | 108.1 | -2.73 | -2.13 | 0.825 | 45.6% | -61 | +156 | — | 36.0% | -1.32 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1959 | 153.2 | +4.80 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +53 | -121 | -236 | 65.1% | +1.10 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 102.1 | +1.00 | 2025 | 1593 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 28 | 2026 | 2030 | 160.5 | +5.23 | +0.68 | 1.144 | 52.8% | -1 | -84 | -91 | 66.3% | +1.11 | 9–3 (75%) | 9–4 (69%) | 109.8 | -0.99 | 2026 | 1649 | 113.8 | -0.88 | +1.22 | 1.064 | 51.4% | -28 | +99 | — | 47.4% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.0 | -0.38 |
| Career | — | 2179 | 158.0 | +4.73 | +0.79 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +34 | -153 | -148 | 62.7% | +0.95 | 71–38 (65%) | 50–46 (52%) | 107.7 | -1.65 | — | 1804 | 125.3 | -1.44 | +0.10 | 0.959 | 49.2% | -86 | +160 | -16 | 46.7% | -0.34 | 33–31 (52%) | 27–17 (61%) | 105.9 | +0.89 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 7 | 4 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 14, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Martic | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 12, 2022 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jun 5, 2021 | H2H |