H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Tereza Martincova
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Naomi Osaka vs Tereza Martincova.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |