H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 3-3

Naomi Osaka and Yulia Putintseva are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Yulia Putintseva leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 Washington Open first round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 29 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main-draw meetings
Yulia Putintseva
Kazakhstan Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #51 6-2 7-5 Yulia Putintseva #43 Match data Jul 22, 2025 R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Hard
Naomi Osaka #73 3-6 6-4 6-2 Yulia Putintseva #32 Match data Sep 28, 2024* R64 China Open WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 6-4 6-4 Yulia Putintseva #36 Match data Sep 21, 2019* QF Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Yulia Putintseva #39 7-6(4) 6-2 Naomi Osaka #2 Match data Jul 3, 2019* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Yulia Putintseva #43 6-2 6-3 Naomi Osaka #1 Match data Jun 21, 2019* R16 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Yulia Putintseva #50 6-3 6-3 Naomi Osaka #70 Match data Jan 10, 2018* R32 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #18 #1 7,985 2,178 253 139 64.5% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Yulia Putintseva #67 #20 2,148 1,990 269 267 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Yulia Putintseva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #728 1,489 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,509 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #123 1,489 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2013 5–12 29.4% #109 1,509 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2014 5–6 45.5% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2015 10–17 37.0% #77 1,521 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,046 2 5 2016 28–23 54.9% #33 1,655 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2017 20–27 42.6% #52 1,606 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,039 4 7 2018 19–21 47.5% #44 1,655 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2019 28–24 53.8% #34 1,760 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2020 15–10 60.0% #28 1,836 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2021 31–22 58.5% #42 1,808 0 2
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2022 20–18 52.6% #51 1,740 0 2
28 2026 30–13 69.8% #18 2,030 4 7 2023 22–22 50.0% #66 1,748 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2024 34–17 66.7% #29 1,934 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2025 15–26 36.6% #71 1,740 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2026 16–19 45.7% #67 1,811 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Yulia Putintseva
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 17 16 33 51.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2017 14 18 32 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 11 8 19 57.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 19 14 33 57.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2022 7 9 16 43.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2026 15 8 23 65.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2023 13 14 27 48.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 19 12 31 61.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 1 9 88.9%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 11 17 28 39.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 10 12 22 45.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 192 91 283 67.8% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 158 174 332 47.6% 93 68 161 57.8% 18 25 43 41.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 355/391 of Naomi Osaka's and 498/538 of Yulia Putintseva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Yulia Putintseva
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 0.0 2.0 54.5% 50.0% 35.0% 37.5% 50.0% 43.2% 37.3%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/3 6.5 5.5 51.0% 57.4% 39.3% 52.7% 83.3% 48.1% 45.1%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2013 16/17 2.3 3.0 61.9% 60.5% 45.0% 46.0% 45.4% 54.9% 42.3%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2014 11/11 1.3 3.1 63.0% 58.1% 44.3% 36.2% 51.4% 52.4% 43.5%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2015 23/27 1.1 2.6 63.3% 58.5% 53.3% 52.7% 39.7% 56.4% 40.3%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2016 43/51 1.1 1.9 71.0% 58.8% 49.6% 55.4% 51.1% 56.2% 46.9%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2017 46/48 1.7 2.8 65.9% 59.4% 44.5% 47.4% 48.4% 54.4% 44.5%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2018 36/40 1.1 2.4 69.3% 59.0% 46.2% 41.7% 48.5% 54.8% 44.7%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2019 49/52 1.6 2.5 66.5% 61.6% 47.9% 49.5% 51.6% 56.8% 44.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 25/25 0.9 2.3 69.0% 61.0% 43.7% 52.0% 49.1% 55.7% 44.9%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2021 52/53 1.2 2.5 68.5% 61.7% 49.4% 54.0% 50.9% 57.9% 46.2%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2022 38/38 0.8 2.2 69.5% 61.9% 45.2% 51.2% 46.6% 56.7% 44.5%
28 2026 42/43 5.8 2.5 58.6% 72.8% 49.3% 54.5% 46.9% 63.1% 42.2% 2023 42/45 1.1 2.0 73.4% 61.8% 44.0% 60.0% 48.6% 57.0% 44.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 51/51 1.5 1.7 70.0% 62.4% 50.3% 57.0% 55.0% 58.9% 46.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 28/41 1.5 2.5 71.0% 59.9% 43.6% 49.3% 51.1% 55.4% 39.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 35/35 1.5 2.0 70.6% 58.4% 45.9% 53.3% 45.0% 54.8% 44.1%
Career — 355/393 5.8 2.4 57.0% 72.6% 48.9% 54.8% 50.2% 62.3% 43.0% — 498/538 1.3 2.3 68.6% 60.5% 46.9% 51.6% 49.4% 56.2% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Yulia Putintseva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1490 97.2 +0.63 -0.74 0.656 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04
16 2014 1531 113.6 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2012 1490 100.8 -0.19 -0.11 0.870 46.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.09
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2013 1509 122.8 -0.51 -0.15 0.936 48.7% +20 +40 +9 33.3% -0.85 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 95.7 -0.80
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -46 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2014 1555 119.1 -1.23 -0.32 0.913 48.3% -1 +24 — 43.5% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 -0.17
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2015 1521 113.7 -1.66 -1.36 0.924 48.1% -46 +102 — 36.7% -0.77 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.9 +0.11
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.63 2016 1656 137.1 +0.36 +2.58 1.071 51.5% -41 +126 -119 51.8% +0.15 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) 103.1 +0.18
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +18 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.43 2017 1606 124.2 -1.52 +0.93 0.975 49.4% +11 +140 -128 41.2% -0.74 7–8 (47%) 6–2 (75%) 102.3 +0.67
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2018 1656 123.1 -1.00 +0.88 0.990 49.7% -27 +80 -146 49.5% -0.07 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 97.9 +0.84
24 2022 1934 147.9 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2019 1760 143.0 +0.19 +1.54 1.026 50.6% -41 +38 -181 53.5% +0.25 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 101.3 -0.99
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1837 137.2 -0.85 +1.84 1.013 50.3% -40 -10 — 56.1% +0.53 7–2 (78%) 1–4 (20%) 103.5 +0.51
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2021 1808 137.8 +1.20 +2.65 1.098 51.8% -16 +24 — 57.9% +0.66 9–12 (43%) 7–4 (64%) 96.3 +0.54
27 2025 1959 153.2 +4.80 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +53 -121 -236 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +1.00 2022 1741 133.0 +0.13 +0.85 1.028 50.6% -18 +116 -198 48.8% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 102.9 +0.49
28 2026 2030 159.4 +5.26 +0.66 1.144 52.8% -1 -84 -92 65.6% +1.05 9–3 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 109.8 -0.99 2023 1749 136.8 -0.38 +1.09 1.031 50.7% 0 +59 — 52.5% +0.28 7–10 (41%) 7–10 (41%) 95.4 -0.65
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1934 154.1 +2.34 +3.48 1.129 52.6% -78 -30 -86 61.2% +0.84 13–8 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 106.6 -2.42
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1741 136.3 -1.20 -2.42 0.889 47.5% +19 +85 -28 37.8% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.6 +0.57
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1811 142.4 -1.66 +1.44 0.976 49.3% +32 +11 — 46.5% -0.24 8–8 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -2.23
Career — 2179 157.2 +4.74 +0.79 1.142 52.6% +34 -153 -148 62.6% +0.95 71–38 (65%) 50–46 (52%) 107.7 -1.65 — 1991 141.7 -0.17 +1.29 1.016 50.3% -19 +64 -109 49.4% +0.01 92–89 (51%) 66–71 (48%) 100.0 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.